Rucking Calories Per Mile: Reference Tables by Weight, Pack, and Pace

All values below are calculated using the Pandolf equation on flat terrain (0% grade) with a standard terrain factor of 1.0. For personalised results including grade and terrain, use the rucking calorie calculator.

Calories Per Mile by Body Weight and Pack Weight

Pace: 5 km/h (12 min/km / 19 min/mile)

Body weightNo pack5 kg pack10 kg pack15 kg pack20 kg pack
60 kg627588101115
70 kg7287103118133
80 kg8299117135152
90 kg92111131151170
100 kg103124145167188

Pace: 6 km/h (10 min/km / 16 min/mile)

Body weightNo pack5 kg pack10 kg pack15 kg pack20 kg pack
60 kg55677991103
70 kg647892106119
80 kg7388104120136
90 kg8299117135153
100 kg91110130150170

Bold values represent the most common training configurations.

Calories Per Hour by Body Weight and Pack Weight

Pace: 5 km/h (flat terrain)

Body weightNo pack5 kg pack10 kg pack15 kg pack20 kg pack
60 kg310375440505575
70 kg360435515590665
80 kg410495585675760
90 kg460555655755850
100 kg515620725835940

Pace: 6 km/h (flat terrain)

Body weightNo pack5 kg pack10 kg pack15 kg pack20 kg pack
60 kg330400474546618
70 kg384468552636714
80 kg438528624720816
90 kg492594702810918
100 kg5466607809001,020

Effect of Grade on Calories Per Hour

80 kg body weight, 10 kg pack, 5 km/h

Terrain gradeCalories/hourvs flat
-5% (downhill)~370−37%
0% (flat)~585baseline
3% incline~760+30%
5% incline~870+49%
8% incline~1,030+76%
10% incline~1,120+92%
15% incline~1,350+131%

Even modest hills dramatically increase calorie burn. A 3 km route that includes a 5% grade hill adds approximately 30% more calories than the same flat route.

Rucking vs Walking vs Running: Calories Per Mile

80 kg person, flat terrain

ActivityPaceCalories/mileCalories/hour
Walking (no pack)5 km/h82410
Rucking (10 kg pack)5 km/h117585
Rucking (20 kg pack)5 km/h152760
Running10 km/h95950
Running12 km/h971,164

Rucking with a 10 kg pack burns 43% more calories per mile than walking unloaded. Running burns more calories per hour but is harder to sustain for the 60–90+ minute sessions typical of rucking. See the rucking vs walking comparison article for a full breakdown.

MET Values for Rucking

MET (metabolic equivalent) values give a standardised measure of exercise intensity relative to resting metabolic rate.

ActivityMET value
Walking (3.2 km/h)2.8
Walking (4.8 km/h)3.5
Rucking (5 km/h, 10% BW load)~5.5
Rucking (5 km/h, 20% BW load)~7.3
Running (8 km/h)8.0
Running (10 km/h)10.0

The Pandolf equation used by the rucking calorie calculator produces more accurate results than MET estimates because it accounts for the specific interaction between body weight, pack weight, and walking speed — rather than applying a fixed multiplier.

How to Use These Tables

  1. Find your body weight row
  2. Find the pack weight column closest to your loaded pack
  3. Multiply calories/mile by your planned distance, or calories/hour by planned duration
  4. Add 10–15% for hilly terrain
  5. For personalised results with your exact pace, grade, and terrain — use the rucking calorie calculator

For training planning using these calorie numbers, see the rucking for weight loss guide.

References & Sources

  1. [1] Pandolf et al., 1977 — Load Carriage Energy Expenditure (PubMed) (opens in new tab)
  2. [2] Ainsworth et al. — Compendium of Physical Activities (MET values) (opens in new tab)